Design Package Sequencing Conflicts

[Anonymous]

We’ve noticed recurring issues with design packages being issued out of logical construction sequence. This causes rework when field teams receive incomplete design intent for certain assemblies. Our project controls team proposed adding a constructability gate at each issue milestone. Has anyone implemented stage-gate reviews that effectively flag sequencing risks before IFC release? We’re exploring options that won’t delay approvals.

[Anonymous]

We had a similar problem when design packages were issued out of build sequence, leading to field confusion and partial rework. Introducing a review step based on https://www.fields-builds.com/blog/constructability-review-best-practices helped us align drawings with construction logic. Setting up quick constructability gates at each milestone ensured assemblies were reviewed for sequencing before IFC, improving flow without slowing approvals.

[Author]

Posts